京ICP备13020181号-2
© 《China Plastics》
© 《China Plastics》
China Plastics ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (11): 52-58.DOI: 10.19491/j.issn.1001-9278.2020.11.010
• Processing and Application • Previous Articles Next Articles
WEI Chenjie, WANG Jifen(), QIN Ge, DU Haoyu, MU Yilong
Received:
2020-06-02
Online:
2020-11-26
Published:
2020-11-20
CLC Number:
WEI Chenjie, WANG Jifen, QIN Ge, DU Haoyu, MU Yilong. Nondestructive Study of Bumper Evidence Based on Spectral Classification Model[J]. China Plastics, 2020, 34(11): 52-58.
品牌 | 样本 |
---|---|
奥迪 | AD?1、AD?2、AD?3、AD?4、AD?5、AD?6、AD?7 |
长安 | CA?1、CA?2、CA?3、CA?4、CA?5 |
东风 | DF?1、DF?2、DF?3、DF?4 |
福特 | FT?1、FT?2、FT?3、FT?4、FT?5、FT?6、FT?7、FT?8 |
奇瑞 | QR?1、QR?2、QR?3 |
日产 | RC?1、RC?2、RC?3、RC?4、RC?5、RC?6、RC?7 |
雪佛兰 | XF?1、XF?2、XF?3 |
别克 | BK?1、BK?2、BK?3、BK?4、BK?5、BK?6 |
本田 | BT?1、BT?2、BT?3、BT?4、BT?5、BT?6 |
现代 | XD?1、XD?2、XD?3 |
品牌 | 样本 |
---|---|
奥迪 | AD?1、AD?2、AD?3、AD?4、AD?5、AD?6、AD?7 |
长安 | CA?1、CA?2、CA?3、CA?4、CA?5 |
东风 | DF?1、DF?2、DF?3、DF?4 |
福特 | FT?1、FT?2、FT?3、FT?4、FT?5、FT?6、FT?7、FT?8 |
奇瑞 | QR?1、QR?2、QR?3 |
日产 | RC?1、RC?2、RC?3、RC?4、RC?5、RC?6、RC?7 |
雪佛兰 | XF?1、XF?2、XF?3 |
别克 | BK?1、BK?2、BK?3、BK?4、BK?5、BK?6 |
本田 | BT?1、BT?2、BT?3、BT?4、BT?5、BT?6 |
现代 | XD?1、XD?2、XD?3 |
类型 | 样本 | 峰值/cm?1 | 振动归因 |
---|---|---|---|
PP | AD?1、AD?6、CA?1、DF?1、DF?4、QR?1、BT?1、BT?6 | 1 376 | C—H3变形振动 |
1 456 | C—H2弯曲振动 | ||
2 850、2 917 | C—H2伸缩振动 | ||
2 867、2 950 | C—H3伸缩振动 | ||
PP/滑石粉/CaCO3 | CA?2、CA?3、FT?5、QR?3、XF?2、BK?1、BK?2、BK?5 | 670 | O—H弯曲振动 |
876 | 碳酸根离子面外变形振动 | ||
1 457 | C—O的伸缩振动与C—H2弯曲振动 | ||
1 016 | Si—O伸缩振动 | ||
3 676 | 结晶水的O—H 伸缩振动 | ||
1 376 | C—H3变形振动 | ||
1 456 | C—H2弯曲振动 | ||
2 850、2 917 | C—H2伸缩振动 | ||
2 867、2 950 | C—H3伸缩振动 | ||
PP/滑石粉 | AD?2、AD?3、AD?4、AD?5、AD?7、CA?4、CA?5、DF?2、DF?3、FT?1、FT?2、FT?3、FT?4、FT?6、FT?7、FT?8、QR?2、RC?1、RC?2、RC?3、RC?4、RC?5、RC?6、RC?7、XF?1、XF?3、BK?3、BK?4、BK?6、BT?2、BT?3、BT?4、BT?5、XD?1、XD?2、XD?3 | 670 | O—H 弯曲振动 |
1 016 | Si—O伸缩振动 | ||
3 676 | 结晶水的O—H 伸缩振动 | ||
1 376 | C—H3变形振动 | ||
1 456 | C—H2弯曲振动 | ||
2 850、2 917 | C—H2伸缩振动 | ||
2867、 950 | C—H3伸缩振动 |
类型 | 样本 | 峰值/cm?1 | 振动归因 |
---|---|---|---|
PP | AD?1、AD?6、CA?1、DF?1、DF?4、QR?1、BT?1、BT?6 | 1 376 | C—H3变形振动 |
1 456 | C—H2弯曲振动 | ||
2 850、2 917 | C—H2伸缩振动 | ||
2 867、2 950 | C—H3伸缩振动 | ||
PP/滑石粉/CaCO3 | CA?2、CA?3、FT?5、QR?3、XF?2、BK?1、BK?2、BK?5 | 670 | O—H弯曲振动 |
876 | 碳酸根离子面外变形振动 | ||
1 457 | C—O的伸缩振动与C—H2弯曲振动 | ||
1 016 | Si—O伸缩振动 | ||
3 676 | 结晶水的O—H 伸缩振动 | ||
1 376 | C—H3变形振动 | ||
1 456 | C—H2弯曲振动 | ||
2 850、2 917 | C—H2伸缩振动 | ||
2 867、2 950 | C—H3伸缩振动 | ||
PP/滑石粉 | AD?2、AD?3、AD?4、AD?5、AD?7、CA?4、CA?5、DF?2、DF?3、FT?1、FT?2、FT?3、FT?4、FT?6、FT?7、FT?8、QR?2、RC?1、RC?2、RC?3、RC?4、RC?5、RC?6、RC?7、XF?1、XF?3、BK?3、BK?4、BK?6、BT?2、BT?3、BT?4、BT?5、XD?1、XD?2、XD?3 | 670 | O—H 弯曲振动 |
1 016 | Si—O伸缩振动 | ||
3 676 | 结晶水的O—H 伸缩振动 | ||
1 376 | C—H3变形振动 | ||
1 456 | C—H2弯曲振动 | ||
2 850、2 917 | C—H2伸缩振动 | ||
2867、 950 | C—H3伸缩振动 |
成分 | 初始特征值 | 提取平方和载入 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
特征根 | 方差 贡献率/ % | 累积 方差贡献率/% | 特征根 | 方差 贡献率/ % | 累积 方差贡献率/% | |
1 | 803.688 | 88.512 | 88.512 | 803.688 | 88.512 | 88.512 |
2 | 43.149 | 4.752 | 93.264 | 43.149 | 4.752 | 93.264 |
3 | 30.208 | 3.327 | 96.591 | 30.208 | 3.327 | 96.591 |
4 | 11.347 | 1.250 | 97.841 | 11.347 | 1.250 | 97.841 |
5 | 5.694 | 0.627 | 98.468 | 5.694 | 0.627 | 98.468 |
6 | 2.989 | 0.329 | 98.797 | 2.989 | 0.329 | 98.797 |
7 | 2.400 | 0.264 | 99.061 | 2.400 | 0.264 | 99.061 |
8 | 2.044 | 0.225 | 99.286 | 2.044 | 0.225 | 99.286 |
9 | 1.801 | 0.198 | 99.485 | 1.801 | 0.198 | 99.485 |
10 | 1.455 | 0.160 | 99.645 | 1.455 | 0.160 | 99.645 |
11 | 0.717 | 0.079 | 99.724 | - | ||
12 | 0.469 | 0.052 | 99.776 | |||
13 | 0.406 | 0.045 | 99.820 | |||
14 | 0.385 | 0.042 | 99.863 | |||
15 | 0.268 | 0.030 | 99.892 |
成分 | 初始特征值 | 提取平方和载入 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
特征根 | 方差 贡献率/ % | 累积 方差贡献率/% | 特征根 | 方差 贡献率/ % | 累积 方差贡献率/% | |
1 | 803.688 | 88.512 | 88.512 | 803.688 | 88.512 | 88.512 |
2 | 43.149 | 4.752 | 93.264 | 43.149 | 4.752 | 93.264 |
3 | 30.208 | 3.327 | 96.591 | 30.208 | 3.327 | 96.591 |
4 | 11.347 | 1.250 | 97.841 | 11.347 | 1.250 | 97.841 |
5 | 5.694 | 0.627 | 98.468 | 5.694 | 0.627 | 98.468 |
6 | 2.989 | 0.329 | 98.797 | 2.989 | 0.329 | 98.797 |
7 | 2.400 | 0.264 | 99.061 | 2.400 | 0.264 | 99.061 |
8 | 2.044 | 0.225 | 99.286 | 2.044 | 0.225 | 99.286 |
9 | 1.801 | 0.198 | 99.485 | 1.801 | 0.198 | 99.485 |
10 | 1.455 | 0.160 | 99.645 | 1.455 | 0.160 | 99.645 |
11 | 0.717 | 0.079 | 99.724 | - | ||
12 | 0.469 | 0.052 | 99.776 | |||
13 | 0.406 | 0.045 | 99.820 | |||
14 | 0.385 | 0.042 | 99.863 | |||
15 | 0.268 | 0.030 | 99.892 |
模型 | 准确率/% | 总体分类准确率/% | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AD | CA | DF | FT | QR | RC | XF | BK | BT | XD | |||
FDA | PCA | 71.4 | 60 | 100 | 87.5 | 66.7 | 85.7 | 66.7 | 83.3 | 100 | 100 | 82.7 |
指纹区 | 42.9 | 60 | 50 | 62.5 | 66.7 | 85.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 50 | 100 | 63.5 | |
全波段 | 42.9 | 60 | 50 | 62.5 | 66.7 | 85.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 50 | 100 | 63.5 | |
KNN | PCA | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 75.0 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 16.7 | 0 | 100 | 38.5 |
指纹区 | 28.6 | 0 | 0 | 75.0 | 0 | 42.9 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 26.9 | |
全波段 | 42.9 | 0 | 0 | 50.0 | 0 | 14.3 | 0 | 16.7 | 33.3 | 0 | 21.2 |
模型 | 准确率/% | 总体分类准确率/% | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AD | CA | DF | FT | QR | RC | XF | BK | BT | XD | |||
FDA | PCA | 71.4 | 60 | 100 | 87.5 | 66.7 | 85.7 | 66.7 | 83.3 | 100 | 100 | 82.7 |
指纹区 | 42.9 | 60 | 50 | 62.5 | 66.7 | 85.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 50 | 100 | 63.5 | |
全波段 | 42.9 | 60 | 50 | 62.5 | 66.7 | 85.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 50 | 100 | 63.5 | |
KNN | PCA | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 75.0 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 16.7 | 0 | 100 | 38.5 |
指纹区 | 28.6 | 0 | 0 | 75.0 | 0 | 42.9 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 26.9 | |
全波段 | 42.9 | 0 | 0 | 50.0 | 0 | 14.3 | 0 | 16.7 | 33.3 | 0 | 21.2 |
模型 | 准确率/% | 总体分类准确率/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PP | PP/滑石粉 | PP/滑石粉/CaCO3 | |||
FDA | PCA | 62.5 | 87.5 | 100 | 92.3 |
指纹区 | 62.5 | 87.5 | 75.0 | 75.0 | |
全波段 | 62.5 | 87.5 | 91.7 | 86.5 | |
KNN | PCA | 50.0 | 37.5 | 100 | 82.7 |
指纹区 | 50.0 | 12.5 | 88.9 | 71.2 | |
全波段 | 50.0 | 50 | 97.2 | 82.7 |
模型 | 准确率/% | 总体分类准确率/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PP | PP/滑石粉 | PP/滑石粉/CaCO3 | |||
FDA | PCA | 62.5 | 87.5 | 100 | 92.3 |
指纹区 | 62.5 | 87.5 | 75.0 | 75.0 | |
全波段 | 62.5 | 87.5 | 91.7 | 86.5 | |
KNN | PCA | 50.0 | 37.5 | 100 | 82.7 |
指纹区 | 50.0 | 12.5 | 88.9 | 71.2 | |
全波段 | 50.0 | 50 | 97.2 | 82.7 |
模型 | 准确率/% | 总体分类准确率/% | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AD | CA | DF | FT | QR | RC | XF | BK | BT | XD | |||
FDA | PCA | 80 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 88.9 |
指纹区 | 80 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 100 | 85.7 | 100 | 66.7 | 25 | 100 | 69.4 | |
全波段 | 80 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 100 | 85.7 | 100 | 66.7 | 25 | 100 | 69.4 | |
KNN | PCA | 60 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 100 | 47.2 |
指纹区 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.2 | |
全波段 | 20 | 0 | 25 | 80 | 0 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66.7 | 33.3 |
模型 | 准确率/% | 总体分类准确率/% | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AD | CA | DF | FT | QR | RC | XF | BK | BT | XD | |||
FDA | PCA | 80 | 50 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 88.9 |
指纹区 | 80 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 100 | 85.7 | 100 | 66.7 | 25 | 100 | 69.4 | |
全波段 | 80 | 50 | 50 | 60 | 100 | 85.7 | 100 | 66.7 | 25 | 100 | 69.4 | |
KNN | PCA | 60 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 100 | 47.2 |
指纹区 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.2 | |
全波段 | 20 | 0 | 25 | 80 | 0 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66.7 | 33.3 |
1 | 王怡明,朱 娟,朱雪华,等.改性聚丙烯汽车保险杠的应用及发展前景[J].广东化工,2018,45(22):71⁃72. |
WANG Y M, ZHU J, ZHU X H, et al. Application and Development Prospect of Modified Polypropylene Automobile Bumper[J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2018,45(22):71⁃72. | |
2 | 刘喜军,贾宏革,唐万侠,等.汽车保险杠仪表盘及门板专用料的研制[J].齐齐哈尔大学学报,2001,17(1):30⁃34. |
LIU X J, JIA H G, TANG W X, et al. Developing of Automobile Bumper,Instrument Panel and Door Special Materials [J]. Journal of Qiqihar University, 2001,17(1):30⁃34. | |
3 | 孙卫健.汽车保险杠用刚性粒子增韧聚丙烯材料的研制[J].汽车技术,2000(10):25⁃28. |
SUN W J. Development of Polyproplyene Material Strengthened Its Toughness by Rigid Grain for Automobile Bumper [J]. Automobile Technology,2000(10):25⁃28. | |
4 | HOFFER M E, BALABAN C, LADE M D, et al. Amelioration of Acute Sequelae of Blast Induced Mild Traumatic Brain Injury by N⁃acetylcysteine: A Double⁃Blind, Placebo Controlled Studys[J]. Plos One, 2013, 8(1): e54163. |
5 | HOFFER M E, BALABAN C, GOTTSHALL K, et al. Blast Exposure: Vestibular Consequences and Associated Characteristics[J]. Otology & Neurotology, 2010, 31(2): 232⁃236. |
6 | MIKHAILENKO P, BERTRON A, RINGOTE. Methods for Analyzing the Chemical Mechanisms of Bitumen Aging and Rejuvenation with FTIR Spectrometry[C].//8th RILEM International Symposium on Testing and Characterization of Sustainable and Innovative Bituminous Materials. RILEM Bookseries,2016:DOI:10.1007/978-94-017-7342-3-17. |
7 | NAM Y S,PARK J S,LEE Y, et al. Application of Micro⁃Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy to Ink Examination in Signatures Written with Ballpoint Pen on Questioned Documents [J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2014, 59(3): 800⁃805. |
8 | CHAN K W, TAN G H, WONG R C S. Forensic Applications of IR Spectral Data at Macro and Micro Levels: A Study on Plastic Packages [J]. Spectroscopy Letters, 2011, 44(6), 440⁃449. |
9 | 王继芬,高春芳,徐佰祺, 等.鞋底材料的中红外光谱可视化快速鉴别[J].中国塑料,2019,33(8):101⁃105. |
WANG J F, GAO C F, XU B Q, et al. Rapid Identification of Sole Materials with Mid⁃Infrared Visible Spectroscopy [J]. China Plastics, 2019,33(8):101⁃105. | |
10 | OMAR J, SLOWIKOWSKI B, BOIX A. Chemometric Approach for Discriminating Tobacco Trademarks by Near Infrared Spectroscopy [J]. Forensic Science International, 2019,294:15⁃20. |
11 | RODRIGUES E, BRITO L, BRAZ A, SALDANHA HONORATO R S, et al. Evaluating the Potential of Near Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging Associated with Multivariate Data Analysis for Examining Crossing Ink Lines [J]. Forensic Science International, 2019,298:169⁃176. |
12 | HE X L, WANG J F. 2020. Rapid and Nondestructive Forensic Identification of Tire Particles by Attenuated Total Reflectance⁃Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics [J]. Analytical Letters,2020,53(5): 714⁃734. |
13 | 何欣龙,刘文浩,王继芬.红外光谱结合多元统计学检验汽车前保险杠[J].光散射学报,2018,30(1):70⁃76. |
HE X L, LIU W H, WANG J F. Examination the Front Bumpers Based on Infrared Spectroscopy and Multivariate Statistical[J]. The Journal of Light Scattering, 2018,30 (1): 70⁃76. | |
14 | 何欣龙,王继芬,王 飞,等.二阶导数红外光谱快速鉴别轮胎橡胶颗粒[J].中国测试, 2019,45(9):60⁃64+83. |
HE X L, WANG J F, WANG F, et al. Rapid Identification of Rubber Particles Based on Second Derivative Infrared Spectra [J]. China Measurement & Testing Techno⁃logy, 2019,45 (9): 60⁃64 + 83. | |
15 | 何欣龙,陈利波,王继芬,等.基于K近邻算法的塑钢窗拉曼光谱分析[J]. 激光与光电子学进展,2018,55(5):409⁃413. |
HE X L, CHEN L B, WANG J F, et al. The Raman Spectroscopy Analysis of the Plastic Steel Window Based on K Nearest Neighbors Algorithm [J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2018,55(5):409⁃413. | |
16 | 何欣龙,王继芬,韩育林,等.舰船甲板油漆红外指纹图谱的无损鉴别[J].兵器材料科学与工程,2019,42(6):97⁃101. |
HE X L, WANG J F, HAN Y L, et al. Nondestructive Identification of Ship Deck Paint with Infrared Fingerprint Spectrum[J]. Ordnance Material Science and Engineering, 2019, 42(6):97⁃101. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||