China Plastics ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (8): 13-19.DOI: 10.19491/j.issn.1001-9278.2023.08.003

• Materials and Properties • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of different rigid reinforcing fillers on properties of PTFE

LI Hongbo(), YANG Rui, SU Zhengtao()   

  1. Key Laboratory of Vibration and Noise Reduction Materials and Application Technology,AECC Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials,Beijing 100095,China
  • Received:2023-03-15 Online:2023-08-26 Published:2023-08-21

Abstract:

Five types of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)⁃based composites with carbon fiber (CF), wollastonite fiber (WF), polyimide (PI), polyoxybenzoyl (POB) and copper powder (Cu) at a volume fraction of 25 vol% were prepared. The effects of different fillers on the mechanical properties, creep properties, thermal conductivity and tribological performance of the composites were comparatively investigated. The micro⁃morphology of the worn surface of the composites was analyzed, and their wear⁃resistant mechanism was discussed. The results indicated that the hardness and compressive strength of PTFE were significantly enhanced by the five types of rigid fillers, its creep was reduced, and its thermal conductance was improved. However, the tensile strength and elongation at break of PTFE were greatly reduced. The CF⁃modified PTFE composite exhibited the highest tensile and compressive strength and the best creep resistance. Meanwhile, the Cu⁃modified PTFE composite presented the highest hardness and the best thermal conductance. The modified PTFE obtained a considerably improvement in wear resistance due to the enrichment of the rigid fillers at the wear scar interface. The three types of inorganic fillers increased the friction coefficient of PTFE, whereas the two types of polymer fillers, PI and POB, reduced its friction coefficient slightly. The POB⁃modified PTFE composite presented the best tribological performance with a friction coefficient of only 0.19 and a volume wear rate of around 4.21×10-6 mm3/(N·m). Its wear resistance was 260 times higher than that of pure PTFE.

Key words: polytetrafluoroethylene, filler modification, reinforcing fiber, tribological performance, mechanical property

CLC Number: