京ICP备13020181号-2
© 《China Plastics》
© 《China Plastics》
China Plastics ›› 2025, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 97-103.DOI: 10.19491/j.issn.1001-9278.2025.01.016
• Plastic and Environment • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Zhuo1(), HU Jie2, MA Chao1(
), LI Xiaohui1, BAN Tiantian1, LIU Xiaocui1
Received:
2024-01-31
Online:
2025-01-26
Published:
2025-02-14
CLC Number:
CHEN Zhuo, HU Jie, MA Chao, LI Xiaohui, BAN Tiantian, LIU Xiaocui. Effects of biodegradable mulching films on yield, soil environment and economic benefit of Chinese cabbage under terrain and climate conditions in Guizhou province[J]. China Plastics, 2025, 39(1): 97-103.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.plaschina.com.cn/EN/10.19491/j.issn.1001-9278.2025.01.016
处理 | 供试地膜 | 作物 |
---|---|---|
T1 | 覆盖上海弘睿生物科技有限公司生产的主体材料为PBAT和PLA的厚度为0.010 mm的微米级填料可降解黑色地膜 | 白菜 |
T2 | 覆盖上海弘睿生物科技有限公司生产的主体材料为PBAT和PLA的厚度为0.008 mm的微米级填料可降解黑色地膜 | |
T3 | 覆盖上海弘睿生物科技有限公司生产的主体材料为PBAT和PLA的厚度为0.010 mm的纳米级填料可降解黑色地膜 | |
T4 | 覆盖上海弘睿生物科技有限公司生产的主体材料为PBAT和PLA的厚度为0.008 mm的纳米级填料可降解黑色地膜 | |
T5 | 覆盖上海弘睿生物科技有限公司生产的主体材料为PBAT和PLA的厚度为0.006 mm的纳米级填料可降解黑色地膜 | |
CK | 覆盖稼乐蜜农资工厂自营店购买的主体材料为PE的厚度为0.010 mm的普通黑色地膜 |
处理 | 供试地膜 | 作物 |
---|---|---|
T1 | 覆盖上海弘睿生物科技有限公司生产的主体材料为PBAT和PLA的厚度为0.010 mm的微米级填料可降解黑色地膜 | 白菜 |
T2 | 覆盖上海弘睿生物科技有限公司生产的主体材料为PBAT和PLA的厚度为0.008 mm的微米级填料可降解黑色地膜 | |
T3 | 覆盖上海弘睿生物科技有限公司生产的主体材料为PBAT和PLA的厚度为0.010 mm的纳米级填料可降解黑色地膜 | |
T4 | 覆盖上海弘睿生物科技有限公司生产的主体材料为PBAT和PLA的厚度为0.008 mm的纳米级填料可降解黑色地膜 | |
T5 | 覆盖上海弘睿生物科技有限公司生产的主体材料为PBAT和PLA的厚度为0.006 mm的纳米级填料可降解黑色地膜 | |
CK | 覆盖稼乐蜜农资工厂自营店购买的主体材料为PE的厚度为0.010 mm的普通黑色地膜 |
处理 | 含水率/% | pH值 | 全盐/g·kg-1 | 容重/g·m-3 | 总孔隙度/% | 阳离子交换量/cmol+·kg-1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 8.7c | 7.68a | 1.12bc | 0.88b | 54c | 21.9b |
T2 | 11.4ab | 7.230b | 1.35b | 1.02ab | 57.8b | 25a |
T3 | 12.2a | 7.17bc | 0.834d | 1.06ab | 60.5b | 20.4b |
T4 | 10.9b | 7.05bc | 0.879cd | 1.06ab | 63.5a | 20.1b |
T5 | 10.7b | 7.03bc | 0.944cd | 1.02ab | 60.1b | 22.1b |
CK | 7.6d | 6.82c | 2.12a | 1.18a | 57.4b | 17.4c |
处理 | 含水率/% | pH值 | 全盐/g·kg-1 | 容重/g·m-3 | 总孔隙度/% | 阳离子交换量/cmol+·kg-1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 8.7c | 7.68a | 1.12bc | 0.88b | 54c | 21.9b |
T2 | 11.4ab | 7.230b | 1.35b | 1.02ab | 57.8b | 25a |
T3 | 12.2a | 7.17bc | 0.834d | 1.06ab | 60.5b | 20.4b |
T4 | 10.9b | 7.05bc | 0.879cd | 1.06ab | 63.5a | 20.1b |
T5 | 10.7b | 7.03bc | 0.944cd | 1.02ab | 60.1b | 22.1b |
CK | 7.6d | 6.82c | 2.12a | 1.18a | 57.4b | 17.4c |
处理 | >5 mm | 5 mm~3 mm | 3 mm~2 mm | 2 mm~1 mm | 1 mm~0.5 mm | 0.5 mm~0.25 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 10.4 | 21.4 | 31.1 | 29.6 |
T2 | 2.4 | 5 | 10.5 | 21.3 | 31 | 29.8 |
T3 | 7.7 | 4.1 | 8.1 | 19.4 | 29.2 | 31.4 |
T4 | 4.7 | 5.6 | 10.2 | 19.6 | 31.5 | 28.4 |
T5 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 7.0 | 13.4 | 24.8 | 50.4 |
CK | 8.4 | 5.4 | 11.0 | 18.8 | 27.6 | 28.9 |
处理 | >5 mm | 5 mm~3 mm | 3 mm~2 mm | 2 mm~1 mm | 1 mm~0.5 mm | 0.5 mm~0.25 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 2.4 | 5.2 | 10.4 | 21.4 | 31.1 | 29.6 |
T2 | 2.4 | 5 | 10.5 | 21.3 | 31 | 29.8 |
T3 | 7.7 | 4.1 | 8.1 | 19.4 | 29.2 | 31.4 |
T4 | 4.7 | 5.6 | 10.2 | 19.6 | 31.5 | 28.4 |
T5 | 1.0 | 3.4 | 7.0 | 13.4 | 24.8 | 50.4 |
CK | 8.4 | 5.4 | 11.0 | 18.8 | 27.6 | 28.9 |
处理 | 有机质/g·kg-1 | 总氮/g·kg-1 | 水解性氮/mg·kg-1 | 总磷/g·kg-1 | 有效磷/mg·kg-1 | 速效钾/mg·kg-1 | 全钾/g·kg-1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 73.6b | 2.08c | 49.6a | 1.96c | 134d | 297b | 9.4a |
T2 | 88.2a | 3.54a | 51.3a | 2.94a | 222a | 403a | 8.9a |
T3 | 59.4c | 1.97c | 20.8d | 1.93c | 158c | 300b | 8.4a |
T4 | 71.4b | 2.86b | 20.7d | 2.54b | 161c | 278c | 9.4a |
T5 | 90.4a | 3.73a | 30.6c | 1.61d | 203b | 303b | 9.3a |
CK | 46.9d | 1.99c | 36.9b | 1.28e | 101e | 239d | 9.3a |
处理 | 有机质/g·kg-1 | 总氮/g·kg-1 | 水解性氮/mg·kg-1 | 总磷/g·kg-1 | 有效磷/mg·kg-1 | 速效钾/mg·kg-1 | 全钾/g·kg-1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 73.6b | 2.08c | 49.6a | 1.96c | 134d | 297b | 9.4a |
T2 | 88.2a | 3.54a | 51.3a | 2.94a | 222a | 403a | 8.9a |
T3 | 59.4c | 1.97c | 20.8d | 1.93c | 158c | 300b | 8.4a |
T4 | 71.4b | 2.86b | 20.7d | 2.54b | 161c | 278c | 9.4a |
T5 | 90.4a | 3.73a | 30.6c | 1.61d | 203b | 303b | 9.3a |
CK | 46.9d | 1.99c | 36.9b | 1.28e | 101e | 239d | 9.3a |
处理 | 亩产量/ kg·(667 m2)-1 | 单价/ 元·kg-1 | 每亩收益/ 元·kg-1 | 地膜单价/ 元·kg-1 | 每亩地膜价/ 元·(667 m2)-1 | 每亩人工成本/ 元 | 其他成本/ 元 | 总成本/ 元 | 利润/ 元 | 产投比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 2 452 | 2 | 4 904 | 30 | 150 | 800 | 500 | 1 450 | 3 454 | 3.39 |
T2 | 2 692 | 2 | 5 384 | 30 | 120 | 800 | 500 | 1 420 | 3 964 | 3.80 |
T3 | 2 552 | 2 | 5 104 | 33 | 165 | 800 | 500 | 1 465 | 3 639 | 3.48 |
T4 | 2 516 | 2 | 5 032 | 33 | 132 | 800 | 500 | 1 432 | 3 600 | 3.51 |
T5 | 2 844 | 2 | 5 688 | 33 | 99 | 800 | 500 | 1 399 | 4 289 | 4.07 |
CK | 2 568 | 2 | 5 136 | 12 | 60 | 960 | 500 | 1 520 | 3 616 | 3.38 |
处理 | 亩产量/ kg·(667 m2)-1 | 单价/ 元·kg-1 | 每亩收益/ 元·kg-1 | 地膜单价/ 元·kg-1 | 每亩地膜价/ 元·(667 m2)-1 | 每亩人工成本/ 元 | 其他成本/ 元 | 总成本/ 元 | 利润/ 元 | 产投比 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 2 452 | 2 | 4 904 | 30 | 150 | 800 | 500 | 1 450 | 3 454 | 3.39 |
T2 | 2 692 | 2 | 5 384 | 30 | 120 | 800 | 500 | 1 420 | 3 964 | 3.80 |
T3 | 2 552 | 2 | 5 104 | 33 | 165 | 800 | 500 | 1 465 | 3 639 | 3.48 |
T4 | 2 516 | 2 | 5 032 | 33 | 132 | 800 | 500 | 1 432 | 3 600 | 3.51 |
T5 | 2 844 | 2 | 5 688 | 33 | 99 | 800 | 500 | 1 399 | 4 289 | 4.07 |
CK | 2 568 | 2 | 5 136 | 12 | 60 | 960 | 500 | 1 520 | 3 616 | 3.38 |
1 | 李兆鹏,夏楠楠,王彩云,等. 有色地膜对花生朱砂叶螨的忌避作用及机理[J]. 花生学报,2020, 49(1): 54⁃58. |
LI Z P, XIA N N, WANG C Y, et al. Repellent effect of colored film⁃mulching to tetranychuscinnabarinus on peanut[J]. Journal of Peanut Science, 2020, 49(1): 54⁃58. | |
2 | Wang Y P, Li X G, Zhu J,et al.Multi⁃site assessment of the effects of plastic⁃film mulch on dryland maize productivity in semiarid areas in China.Agricultural and forest meteorology,2016,220:160⁃169. |
3 | 宋 芸,樊 平,王 敏,等. 山东滨州地膜残留现状、危害及防治对策[J]. 中国农学通报,2022, 38(14): 104⁃109. |
SONG Y, FAN P, WANG M, et al. Current situation, risk and prevention countermeasures of mulching film residues in Binzhou, Shandong[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(14): 104⁃109. | |
4 | 栾 剑. 大连市农用地膜危害及防治措施[J]. 新农业, 2019(13): 33⁃34. |
LUAN J. Hazards and control measures of agricultural plastic mulch in Dalian City[J]. New Agriculture, 2019(13): 33⁃34. | |
5 | 国家统计局官网[EB/OL].(2003⁃05⁃20)[2023⁃06⁃20]. |
6 | 张 凯,郭继民,王 坤,等.全生物降解地膜在农业生产中的推广应用前景分析[J].中国果菜,2023,43(4):62⁃66. |
ZHANG K, GUO J M, WANG K, et al. Analysis of application prospect of fullly biodegradable plastic film in agricultural production[J].China Fruit & Vegetable, 2023, 43(4): 62⁃66. | |
7 | 杨 雅,李 涛,朱建强,等.生物降解地膜降解特性及其应用对辣椒生长发育的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,2023,28(7):79⁃92. |
YANG Y, LI T, ZHU J Q, et al. Degradation characteristics of biodegradable mulch and its effects on the growth and development of pepper[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2023, 28(7): 79⁃92. | |
8 | 刘现明.覆盖生物降解地膜对马铃薯产量及土壤环境的影响[J].中国农技推广,2023,39(5):72⁃76. |
LIU X M. Application of biodegradable mulching film in garlic cultivation[J].China Agricultural Technology Extension, 2023, 39(5): 72⁃76. | |
9 | 刘国伟,任艳云,张龙平,等.不同生物降解地膜在大蒜上的应用[J].湖南农业科学,2023(3):36⁃39+45. |
LIU G W, REN Y Y, ZHANG L P, et al. Application of different biodegradable mulches in garlic[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2023(3): 36⁃39+45. | |
10 | 刘 淼,邸树峰,樊 超,等.新型生物降解地膜降解性能及对玉米生长的影响[J].黑龙江农业科学,2022(9):31⁃36. |
LIU M, DI S F, FAN C, et al.Study on degradation performance of biodegradable film and its effect on maize growth[J].Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022(9): 31⁃36. | |
11 | 王 龙,贺小伟,胡 灿,等.生物降解地膜降解性能对南疆土壤温湿度及棉花产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2021,39(4):64⁃70+79. |
WANG L, HE X W, HU C, et al. Effects of degradation properties of biodegradable plastic mulches on soil temperature, humidity and cotton yield in Southern Xinjiang[J].Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2021, 39(4): 64⁃70+79. | |
12 | 彭 义,邓广琴,龙 琼,等.贵州省农业当前发展现状、存在问题及其对策分析[J].贵州农机化,2021(3):23⁃26. |
PENG Y, DENG G Q, LONG Q, et al. Analysis of the current development status, existing problems and countermeasures of agriculture in Guizhou Province[J].Guizhou Agricultural Mechaniation, 2021(3): 23⁃26. | |
13 | 刘玉学,陈立天,戴美松,等.浙江省梨主产区梨园土壤理化性质及重金属状况调查分析[J].浙江农业科学,2022,63(11):2 587⁃2 591+2 594. |
LIU Y X, CHEN L T, DAI M S, et al.Investigation of soil pro⁃perties and heavy metal status in pear orchards of main pear producing areas in Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 63(11): 2 587⁃2 591+2 594. | |
14 | 中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978:36⁃61. |
15 | 雷斯越,赵文慧,杨亚辉,等.不同坡位植被生长状况与土壤养分空间分布特征[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(1):86⁃91+105. |
LEI S Y, ZHAO W H, YANG Y H, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics of soil nutrients and vegetation growth status in different slopes[J].Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 26(1): 86⁃91+105. | |
16 | 徐 锴,周凌雁,魏 涛,等.分光光度法测定土壤阳离子交换量的影响因素及方法优化[J].干旱环境监测,2024,38(1):17⁃22. |
XU K, ZHOU L Y, WEI T, et al. Influencing factors and optimization of spectrophotometric determination of soil cation exchange capacity[J].Arid Environmental Monitoring, 2024, 38(1): 17⁃22. | |
17 | 赵 月,刘亚兰,高艳菊,等.水肥与覆膜对油莎豆产量及土壤性质的影响[J].草业科学,2024,41(7):1 757⁃1 766. |
ZHAO Y, LIU Y L, GAO Y J, et al. Effects of water and fertilizer application and film mulching on Cyperus esculentus yield and soil properties[J].Pratacultural Science, 2024, 41(7): 1 757⁃1 766. | |
18 | 王 振,王文敏,顾嘉诚,等.棉秆生物质炭添加对棉田土壤理化性质及根际微生物群落结构的影响[J].土壤,2024,56(3):540⁃547. |
WANG Z, WANG W M, GU J C, et al.Effects of biochar addition on soil physicochemical properties and rhizosphere microbial community structure in cotton fields[J]. Soils, 2024, 56(3): 540⁃547. | |
19 | 王 斌,万艳芳,王金鑫,等. 全生物降解膜对南疆棉花产量及土壤理化性质的影响 [J]. 中国棉花, 2019, 46 (10): 9⁃13. |
WANG B, WAN Y F, WANG J X, et al.Effects of biodegradable mulch film on cotton yield and soil physical and chemical pro⁃perties in Southern Xinjiang, China[J].China Cotton, 2019, 46(10): 9⁃13. | |
20 | 王静波,吴思颖,施林林,等.可降解地膜在黄瓜生产中的应用研究[J].农业与技术,2023,43(18):9⁃12. |
WANG J B, WU S Y, SHI L L, et al. Application study of biodegradable mulch in cucumber production[J].Agriculture and Technology, 2023, 43(18): 9⁃12. | |
21 | 陈晓,何晓婵,周小军,等.全生物降解地膜覆盖对辣椒生长发育及产量的影响[J].长江蔬菜,2023(22):51⁃54. |
CHEN X, HE X C, ZHOU X J, et al.Effect of full biodegradable film on growth and Yield of pepper[J].Journal of Changjiang Vegetables, 2023(22): 51⁃54. | |
22 | 李生太,蔡俊玲,张爱华,等.玉米全生物降解地膜的筛选及适应性研究[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2023,46(4):51⁃53. |
LI S T, CAI J L, ZHANG A H, et al. Screening and adaptability study of full biodegradable mulch for corn[J].Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology, 2023, 46(4): 51⁃53. | |
23 | 张 凯,帅建华,王 琳,等.不同类型地膜在花菜生产上的应用[J].农业装备技术,2023,49(6): 43⁃45. |
ZHANG K, SHUAI J H, WANG L, et al. Application of different types of mulch in cauliflower production[J].Agricultural Equipment & Technology, 2023, 49(6): 43⁃45. | |
24 | 王建科,胡立军,陈永锋,等.不同生物降解膜在春甘蓝生产中的应用试验[J].蔬菜,2024(1):12⁃17. |
WANG J K, HU L J, CHEN Y F, et al. Application experiment of different biodegradable films in the production of cabbage in spring[J]. Vegetables, 2024(1): 12⁃17. | |
25 | 赵海燕,王腾飞,续创业,等.生物降解膜和普通地膜覆盖玉米主要农艺性状和产量比较及相关性分析[J].安徽农业科学,2023,51(14):29⁃32+37. |
ZHAO H Y, WANG T F, XU C Y, et al.Comparison of main agronomic characters and yield of maize covered by biodegradable film and common plastic film and their correlation analysis[J].Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(14): 29⁃32+37. | |
26 | Wu M, ZhangJ Z, Wang Z H,et al. Effects of aerated drip irrigation and degradable film mulching on growth and water use of maize[J].Chinese Journal of Eco⁃Agriculture,2022,30(9):1 425⁃1 438. |
27 | 陈庆华. 生物降解膜覆盖对花生生长发育、产量形成和经济效益的影响 [J]. 农业科技通讯, 2023(4): 117⁃120. |
CHEN Q H. The impact of biodegradable film mulching on the growth, yield formation and economic benefits of peanut[J].Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023(4): 117⁃120. | |
28 | 王泽民,齐广平,田蓉蓉,等. 不同地膜降解性能对玉米土壤水热、产量及经济效益的影响 [J]. 水利规划与设计, 2023(6): 100⁃104+138. |
WANG Z M, QI G P, TIAN R R, et al.Effects of different degradability of plastic film on soil water and heat, yield and economic benefits of maize[J].Water Resources Planning and Design, 2023(6): 100⁃104+138. | |
29 | 张 美,刘金铜,付同刚,等. 农田残留地膜累积生态效应研究进展 [J]. 生态毒理学报, 2023, 18 (3): 223⁃237. |
ZHANG M, LIU J T, FU T G, et al.Review on cumulative ecological effects of mulching film residues in farmland[J].Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology, 2023, 18(3): 223⁃237. |
[1] | XIAO Jinnan, ZHANG Zhenming. Sources, occurrence characteristics and potential risks of microplastics in farmland soils: A review [J]. China Plastics, 2024, 38(9): 137-144. |
[2] | HUO Zhanbin, FU Ye, WENG Yunxuan. Degradation behaviors of PBAT biodegradable mulch film in farmland soil and simulated soil environments [J]. China Plastics, 2023, 37(12): 84-90. |
[3] | GUAN Tonghui, FU Ye, WENG Yunxuan. Degradation behaviors of PBAT biodegradable mulch in soil [J]. China Plastics, 2022, 36(1): 67-72. |
[4] | JIA Xuan, FU Chenxing, ZHANG Junping, LI Mingxiao, LI Xueqi, LIU Xiaopei. Research Status and Application Prospect of Degradable Liquid Mulching Films [J]. China Plastics, 2020, 34(12): 110-118. |
[5] | . Finite Element Analysis of Buried Polyethylene Gas Pipeline Near Impact-loading Zone [J]. China Plastics, 2018, 32(08): 86-91. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||