
《中国塑料》编辑部 ©2008-2024 版权所有
地址:北京市海淀区阜成路11号 邮编:100048
编辑部:010-68985541 联系信箱:cp@plaschina.com.cn
广告部/发行部:010-68985253 本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发
中国塑料 ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 78-85.DOI: 10.19491/j.issn.1001-9278.2022.12.012
收稿日期:
2022-08-22
出版日期:
2022-12-26
发布日期:
2022-12-20
作者简介:
李宁利(1977.7—),女,副教授,研究方向:绿色环保型沥青材料的研究与开发,ln1808@hebut.edu.cn
基金资助:
LI Ningli(), WANG Meng, WANG Rui, ZHU Zhuangzhuang
Received:
2022-08-22
Online:
2022-12-26
Published:
2022-12-20
摘要:
为了合理、有效地利用废旧橡胶粉和废旧塑料并改善两者与沥青的相容性,采用精密开炼机预先将两种废旧材料熔融共混,制备成橡塑(质量)比分别为5∶5(Ⅰ型)、6∶4(Ⅱ型)、和7∶3(Ⅲ型)3种橡塑合金改性剂。按照正交试验方案对伦特70#基质沥青进行改性,制备橡塑合金改性沥青,以橡塑合金改性沥青的48 h离析软化点、25 ℃针入度、软化点和5 ℃延度为指标,筛选橡塑合金改性沥青的最佳复配方案,并通过灰色关联度分析法和极差分析法确定制备工艺最佳的关键参数。最后通过扫描电子显微镜、布氏旋转黏度试验、BBR试验和DSR试验对橡塑合金改性沥青的结构形态、流变性能、低温抗裂性能和抗疲劳性能进行了分析。结果表明:最佳复配方案为外掺20 %(相较于基质沥青质量)橡塑比为7∶3(Ⅲ型)的橡塑合金、2 %增溶剂(糠醛抽出油)和9 %稳定剂(硫磺),制备的橡塑合金改性沥青储存稳定性和高温稳定性良好,推荐制备工艺的最佳关键参数为剪切温度180 ℃、剪切速率3 500 r/min、剪切时间1.5 h和发育时间0.5 h;橡塑合金改性剂与沥青的相容性好,制备的橡塑合金改性沥青具有较低的温度敏感性,较好的低温抗裂性和抗疲劳性能。
中图分类号:
李宁利, 王猛, 王瑞, 朱壮壮. 橡塑合金改性沥青制备工艺关键参数研究[J]. 中国塑料, 2022, 36(12): 78-85.
LI Ningli, WANG Meng, WANG Rui, ZHU Zhuangzhuang. Study on preparation technology of rubber⁃plastic alloy modified asphalt[J]. China Plastics, 2022, 36(12): 78-85.
试验号 | 合金种类 | 合金掺量/% | 增溶剂掺量/% | 稳定剂掺量/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5∶5(1) | 18(1) | 2(1) | 3(1) |
2 | 5∶5(1) | 20(2) | 3(2) | 6(2) |
3 | 5∶5(1) | 22(3) | 4(3) | 9(3) |
4 | 6∶4(2) | 18(1) | 3(2) | 9(3) |
5 | 6∶4(2) | 20(2) | 4(3) | 3(1) |
6 | 6∶4(2) | 22(3) | 2(1) | 6(2) |
7 | 7∶3(3) | 18(1) | 4(3) | 6(2) |
8 | 7∶3(3) | 20(2) | 2(1) | 9(3) |
9 | 7∶3(3) | 22(3) | 3(2) | 3(1) |
试验号 | 合金种类 | 合金掺量/% | 增溶剂掺量/% | 稳定剂掺量/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5∶5(1) | 18(1) | 2(1) | 3(1) |
2 | 5∶5(1) | 20(2) | 3(2) | 6(2) |
3 | 5∶5(1) | 22(3) | 4(3) | 9(3) |
4 | 6∶4(2) | 18(1) | 3(2) | 9(3) |
5 | 6∶4(2) | 20(2) | 4(3) | 3(1) |
6 | 6∶4(2) | 22(3) | 2(1) | 6(2) |
7 | 7∶3(3) | 18(1) | 4(3) | 6(2) |
8 | 7∶3(3) | 20(2) | 2(1) | 9(3) |
9 | 7∶3(3) | 22(3) | 3(2) | 3(1) |
试验号 | 离析试验 | 25 ℃针入度(0.1 mm) | 软化点/℃ | 5 ℃延度/cm | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试样上部软化点/℃ | 试样下部软化点 /℃ | 软化点差/℃ | ||||
1 | 111.4 | 71.2 | 40.2 | 35.70 | 76.3 | 4.0 |
2 | 113.5 | 72.6 | 40.9 | 33.00 | 79.4 | 3.6 |
3 | 115.7 | 74.5 | 41.2 | 32.50 | 85.3 | 3.3 |
4 | 109.4 | 69.9 | 39.5 | 45.00 | 67.7 | 5.6 |
5 | 111.9 | 73.0 | 38.9 | 43.70 | 70.4 | 5.0 |
6 | 113.2 | 74.1 | 39.1 | 42.10 | 72.5 | 4.7 |
7 | 68.8 | 65.7 | 3.1 | 45.60 | 64.4 | 6.7 |
8 | 70.5 | 66.3 | 4.2 | 42.10 | 68.6 | 7.1 |
9 | 74.7 | 69.3 | 5.4 | 41.3 | 72.6 | 7.0 |
试验号 | 离析试验 | 25 ℃针入度(0.1 mm) | 软化点/℃ | 5 ℃延度/cm | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试样上部软化点/℃ | 试样下部软化点 /℃ | 软化点差/℃ | ||||
1 | 111.4 | 71.2 | 40.2 | 35.70 | 76.3 | 4.0 |
2 | 113.5 | 72.6 | 40.9 | 33.00 | 79.4 | 3.6 |
3 | 115.7 | 74.5 | 41.2 | 32.50 | 85.3 | 3.3 |
4 | 109.4 | 69.9 | 39.5 | 45.00 | 67.7 | 5.6 |
5 | 111.9 | 73.0 | 38.9 | 43.70 | 70.4 | 5.0 |
6 | 113.2 | 74.1 | 39.1 | 42.10 | 72.5 | 4.7 |
7 | 68.8 | 65.7 | 3.1 | 45.60 | 64.4 | 6.7 |
8 | 70.5 | 66.3 | 4.2 | 42.10 | 68.6 | 7.1 |
9 | 74.7 | 69.3 | 5.4 | 41.3 | 72.6 | 7.0 |
水平 | 影响因素 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
剪切温度/ ℃ | 剪切速率/ r•min-1 | 剪切时间/h | 发育时间/h | |
1 | 170(1) | 3 000(1) | 0.5(1) | 0.5(1) |
2 | 180(2) | 3 500(2) | 1.0(2) | 1.0(2) |
3 | 190(3) | 4 000(3) | 1.5(3) | 1.5(3) |
水平 | 影响因素 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
剪切温度/ ℃ | 剪切速率/ r•min-1 | 剪切时间/h | 发育时间/h | |
1 | 170(1) | 3 000(1) | 0.5(1) | 0.5(1) |
2 | 180(2) | 3 500(2) | 1.0(2) | 1.0(2) |
3 | 190(3) | 4 000(3) | 1.5(3) | 1.5(3) |
试验号 | 剪切温度/ ℃ | 剪切速率/ r•min-1 | 剪切时间/ h | 发育时间/ h |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 170(1) | 3 000(1) | 0.5(1) | 0.5(1) |
2 | 170(1) | 3 500(2) | 1.0(2) | 1.0(2) |
3 | 170(1) | 4 000(3) | 1.5(3) | 1.5(3) |
4 | 180(2) | 3 000(1) | 1.0(2) | 1.5(3) |
5 | 180(2) | 3 500(2) | 1.5(3) | 0.5(1) |
6 | 180(2) | 4 000(3) | 0.5(1) | 1.0(2) |
7 | 190(3) | 3 000(1) | 1.5(3) | 1.0(2) |
8 | 190(3) | 3 500(2) | 0.5(1) | 1.5(3) |
9 | 190(3) | 4 000(3) | 1.0(2) | 0.5(1) |
试验号 | 剪切温度/ ℃ | 剪切速率/ r•min-1 | 剪切时间/ h | 发育时间/ h |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 170(1) | 3 000(1) | 0.5(1) | 0.5(1) |
2 | 170(1) | 3 500(2) | 1.0(2) | 1.0(2) |
3 | 170(1) | 4 000(3) | 1.5(3) | 1.5(3) |
4 | 180(2) | 3 000(1) | 1.0(2) | 1.5(3) |
5 | 180(2) | 3 500(2) | 1.5(3) | 0.5(1) |
6 | 180(2) | 4 000(3) | 0.5(1) | 1.0(2) |
7 | 190(3) | 3 000(1) | 1.5(3) | 1.0(2) |
8 | 190(3) | 3 500(2) | 0.5(1) | 1.5(3) |
9 | 190(3) | 4 000(3) | 1.0(2) | 0.5(1) |
试验号 | 离析试验 | 25 ℃针入度 (0.1 mm) | 软化点/℃ | 5 ℃延度/cm | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试样上部软化点/ /℃ | 试样下部软化点/℃ | 软化点差/℃ | ||||
1 | 54.2 | 56.0 | 1.8 | 46.2 | 57.3 | 5.3 |
2 | 55.3 | 57.6 | 2.3 | 47.1 | 58.2 | 5.4 |
3 | 56.6 | 59.5 | 2.9 | 45.3 | 62.4 | 5.7 |
4 | 60.3 | 61.5 | 1.2 | 43.5 | 64.2 | 5.9 |
5 | 62.5 | 64.1 | 1.6 | 42.8 | 66.7 | 6.5 |
6 | 61.7 | 63.4 | 1.7 | 43.2 | 65.8 | 5.8 |
7 | 63.7 | 66.9 | 3.2 | 41.5 | 67.9 | 4.6 |
8 | 64.5 | 68.0 | 3.5 | 41.1 | 68.8 | 4.5 |
9 | 65.6 | 69.3 | 3.7 | 40.2 | 70.4 | 4.8 |
试验号 | 离析试验 | 25 ℃针入度 (0.1 mm) | 软化点/℃ | 5 ℃延度/cm | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
试样上部软化点/ /℃ | 试样下部软化点/℃ | 软化点差/℃ | ||||
1 | 54.2 | 56.0 | 1.8 | 46.2 | 57.3 | 5.3 |
2 | 55.3 | 57.6 | 2.3 | 47.1 | 58.2 | 5.4 |
3 | 56.6 | 59.5 | 2.9 | 45.3 | 62.4 | 5.7 |
4 | 60.3 | 61.5 | 1.2 | 43.5 | 64.2 | 5.9 |
5 | 62.5 | 64.1 | 1.6 | 42.8 | 66.7 | 6.5 |
6 | 61.7 | 63.4 | 1.7 | 43.2 | 65.8 | 5.8 |
7 | 63.7 | 66.9 | 3.2 | 41.5 | 67.9 | 4.6 |
8 | 64.5 | 68.0 | 3.5 | 41.1 | 68.8 | 4.5 |
9 | 65.6 | 69.3 | 3.7 | 40.2 | 70.4 | 4.8 |
序列 | 离析试验 软化点差/℃ | 25℃ 针入度 (0.1 mm) | 软化点/ ℃ | 5 ℃延度/ cm |
---|---|---|---|---|
X* | 1.2 | 40.2 | 70.4 | 6.5 |
X1 | 1.8 | 46.2 | 57.3 | 5.3 |
X2 | 2.3 | 47.1 | 58.2 | 5.4 |
X3 | 2.9 | 45.3 | 62.4 | 5.7 |
X4 | 1.2 | 43.5 | 64.2 | 5.9 |
X5 | 1.6 | 42.8 | 66.7 | 6.5 |
X6 | 1.7 | 43.2 | 65.8 | 5.8 |
X7 | 3.2 | 41.5 | 67.9 | 4.6 |
X8 | 3.5 | 41.1 | 68.8 | 4.5 |
X9 | 3.7 | 40.2 | 70.4 | 4.8 |
序列 | 离析试验 软化点差/℃ | 25℃ 针入度 (0.1 mm) | 软化点/ ℃ | 5 ℃延度/ cm |
---|---|---|---|---|
X* | 1.2 | 40.2 | 70.4 | 6.5 |
X1 | 1.8 | 46.2 | 57.3 | 5.3 |
X2 | 2.3 | 47.1 | 58.2 | 5.4 |
X3 | 2.9 | 45.3 | 62.4 | 5.7 |
X4 | 1.2 | 43.5 | 64.2 | 5.9 |
X5 | 1.6 | 42.8 | 66.7 | 6.5 |
X6 | 1.7 | 43.2 | 65.8 | 5.8 |
X7 | 3.2 | 41.5 | 67.9 | 4.6 |
X8 | 3.5 | 41.1 | 68.8 | 4.5 |
X9 | 3.7 | 40.2 | 70.4 | 4.8 |
S* | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 |
---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 0.760 0 | 0.130 4 | 0.000 0 | 0.400 0 |
S2 | 0.560 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.068 7 | 0.450 0 |
S3 | 0.320 0 | 0.260 9 | 0.389 3 | 0.600 0 |
S4 | 1.000 0 | 0.521 7 | 0.526 7 | 0.700 0 |
S5 | 0.840 0 | 0.623 2 | 0.717 6 | 1.000 0 |
S6 | 0.800 0 | 0.565 2 | 0.648 9 | 0.650 0 |
S7 | 0.200 0 | 0.811 6 | 0.809 2 | 0.050 0 |
S8 | 0.080 0 | 0.869 6 | 0.877 9 | 0.000 0 |
S9 | 0.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 0.150 0 |
S* | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 |
---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 0.760 0 | 0.130 4 | 0.000 0 | 0.400 0 |
S2 | 0.560 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.068 7 | 0.450 0 |
S3 | 0.320 0 | 0.260 9 | 0.389 3 | 0.600 0 |
S4 | 1.000 0 | 0.521 7 | 0.526 7 | 0.700 0 |
S5 | 0.840 0 | 0.623 2 | 0.717 6 | 1.000 0 |
S6 | 0.800 0 | 0.565 2 | 0.648 9 | 0.650 0 |
S7 | 0.200 0 | 0.811 6 | 0.809 2 | 0.050 0 |
S8 | 0.080 0 | 0.869 6 | 0.877 9 | 0.000 0 |
S9 | 0.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 0.150 0 |
序列 | ξ1 | ξ2 | ξ3 | ξ4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 0.396 8 | 0.793 1 | 1.000 0 | 0.555 6 |
X2 | 0.471 7 | 1.000 0 | 0.879 2 | 0.526 3 |
X3 | 0.609 8 | 0.657 1 | 0.562 2 | 0.454 5 |
X4 | 0.333 3 | 0.489 4 | 0.487 0 | 0.416 7 |
X5 | 0.373 1 | 0.445 2 | 0.410 7 | 0.333 3 |
X6 | 0.384 6 | 0.469 4 | 0.435 2 | 0.434 8 |
X7 | 0.714 3 | 0.381 2 | 0.381 9 | 0.909 1 |
X8 | 0.862 1 | 0.365 1 | 0.362 9 | 1.000 0 |
X9 | 1.000 0 | 0.333 3 | 0.333 3 | 0.769 2 |
序列 | ξ1 | ξ2 | ξ3 | ξ4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 0.396 8 | 0.793 1 | 1.000 0 | 0.555 6 |
X2 | 0.471 7 | 1.000 0 | 0.879 2 | 0.526 3 |
X3 | 0.609 8 | 0.657 1 | 0.562 2 | 0.454 5 |
X4 | 0.333 3 | 0.489 4 | 0.487 0 | 0.416 7 |
X5 | 0.373 1 | 0.445 2 | 0.410 7 | 0.333 3 |
X6 | 0.384 6 | 0.469 4 | 0.435 2 | 0.434 8 |
X7 | 0.714 3 | 0.381 2 | 0.381 9 | 0.909 1 |
X8 | 0.862 1 | 0.365 1 | 0.362 9 | 1.000 0 |
X9 | 1.000 0 | 0.333 3 | 0.333 3 | 0.769 2 |
试验号 | 离析试验 软化点差/℃ | 25 ℃ 针入度 (0.1 mm) | 软化点/ ℃ | 5 ℃ 延度/ cm | 综合 评分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.8 | 46.2 | 57.3 | 5.3 | 0.33 |
2 | 2.3 | 47.1 | 58.2 | 5.4 | 0.28 |
3 | 2.9 | 45.3 | 62.4 | 5.7 | 0.40 |
4 | 1.2 | 43.5 | 64.2 | 5.9 | 0.70 |
5 | 1.6 | 42.8 | 66.7 | 6.5 | 0.81 |
6 | 1.7 | 43.2 | 65.8 | 5.8 | 0.68 |
7 | 3.2 | 41.5 | 67.9 | 4.6 | 0.46 |
8 | 3.5 | 41.1 | 68.8 | 4.5 | 0.45 |
9 | 3.7 | 40.2 | 70.4 | 4.8 | 0.52 |
试验号 | 离析试验 软化点差/℃ | 25 ℃ 针入度 (0.1 mm) | 软化点/ ℃ | 5 ℃ 延度/ cm | 综合 评分 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1.8 | 46.2 | 57.3 | 5.3 | 0.33 |
2 | 2.3 | 47.1 | 58.2 | 5.4 | 0.28 |
3 | 2.9 | 45.3 | 62.4 | 5.7 | 0.40 |
4 | 1.2 | 43.5 | 64.2 | 5.9 | 0.70 |
5 | 1.6 | 42.8 | 66.7 | 6.5 | 0.81 |
6 | 1.7 | 43.2 | 65.8 | 5.8 | 0.68 |
7 | 3.2 | 41.5 | 67.9 | 4.6 | 0.46 |
8 | 3.5 | 41.1 | 68.8 | 4.5 | 0.45 |
9 | 3.7 | 40.2 | 70.4 | 4.8 | 0.52 |
试验号 | 剪切温度/ ℃ | 剪切速率/ r•min-1 | 剪切时间/ h | 发育时间/ h |
---|---|---|---|---|
k1 | 0.34 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.55 |
k2 | 0.73 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.47 |
k3 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.52 |
R | 0.39 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
试验号 | 剪切温度/ ℃ | 剪切速率/ r•min-1 | 剪切时间/ h | 发育时间/ h |
---|---|---|---|---|
k1 | 0.34 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.55 |
k2 | 0.73 | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.47 |
k3 | 0.48 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.52 |
R | 0.39 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
温度/℃ | 转速/r•min-1 | 黏度/Pa·s | 温度/℃ | 转速/r•min-1 | 黏度/Pa·s | 温度/℃ | 转速/r•min-1 | 黏度/Pa·s |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
135 | 10 | 7.200 | 145 | 10 | 4.375 | 155 | 10 | 2.850 |
20 | 6.463 | 20 | 4.200 | 20 | 2.675 | |||
50 | - | 50 | 3.805 | 50 | 2.460 | |||
100 | - | 100 | - | 100 | 2.230 | |||
165 | 10 | 1.650 | 175 | 10 | 1.375 | 180 | 10 | 1.125 |
20 | 1.600 | 20 | 1.313 | 20 | 1.057 | |||
50 | 1.525 | 50 | 1.240 | 50 | 1.005 | |||
100 | 1.438 | 100 | 1.170 | 100 | 0.932 |
温度/℃ | 转速/r•min-1 | 黏度/Pa·s | 温度/℃ | 转速/r•min-1 | 黏度/Pa·s | 温度/℃ | 转速/r•min-1 | 黏度/Pa·s |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
135 | 10 | 7.200 | 145 | 10 | 4.375 | 155 | 10 | 2.850 |
20 | 6.463 | 20 | 4.200 | 20 | 2.675 | |||
50 | - | 50 | 3.805 | 50 | 2.460 | |||
100 | - | 100 | - | 100 | 2.230 | |||
165 | 10 | 1.650 | 175 | 10 | 1.375 | 180 | 10 | 1.125 |
20 | 1.600 | 20 | 1.313 | 20 | 1.057 | |||
50 | 1.525 | 50 | 1.240 | 50 | 1.005 | |||
100 | 1.438 | 100 | 1.170 | 100 | 0.932 |
沥青种类 | -6 ℃ | -12 ℃ | -18 ℃ | -24 ℃ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S/MPa | m | S/MPa | m | S/MPa | m | S/MPa | m | |
橡塑合金改性伦特沥青 | 35 | 0.576 | 160 | 0.414 | 303 | 0.286 | 531 | 0.213 |
沥青种类 | -6 ℃ | -12 ℃ | -18 ℃ | -24 ℃ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S/MPa | m | S/MPa | m | S/MPa | m | S/MPa | m | |
橡塑合金改性伦特沥青 | 35 | 0.576 | 160 | 0.414 | 303 | 0.286 | 531 | 0.213 |
试样类型 | 试验温度/℃ | G•sinδ/kPa |
---|---|---|
RTFOT+PAV残留物 | 31 | 373 |
28 | 1 737 | |
25 | 2 519 | |
22 | 4 086 | |
19 | 5 617 |
试样类型 | 试验温度/℃ | G•sinδ/kPa |
---|---|---|
RTFOT+PAV残留物 | 31 | 373 |
28 | 1 737 | |
25 | 2 519 | |
22 | 4 086 | |
19 | 5 617 |
1 | 汪晓鹏,李文磊.橡/塑废弃物资源化利用技术的进展和意义[J].上海塑料,2018(04):1⁃4. |
WANG X P, LI W L.The progress of significance for the rubber/plastic waste resource utilization technology[J]. Shanghai Plastics, 2018(04):1⁃4. | |
2 | 吕文姝,王金勤,蔺习雄,等.橡塑复合改性沥青性质影响因素研究[J].石油沥青,2020,34(03):33⁃36. |
LYU W S, WANG J Q, LIN X X, et al.Study on influencing factors and preparation of waste rubber plastic high⁃viscosity modified asphalt[J].Chongqing Architecture,2020,34(03):33⁃36. | |
3 | 张子轮,李剑新,马 明,等.橡胶沥青的环保化制备与应用进展[J].石油沥青,2021,35(04):6⁃13. |
ZHANG Z L, LI J X, MA M,et al.Progress in preparation and application of rubber asphalt for environmental protection [J].Petroleum Asphalt,2021,35(04):6⁃13. | |
4 | 房 斌,吴奇峰,张争奇.橡胶改性沥青存储稳定性及改善措施研究[J].公路,2012(03):203⁃207. |
FANG B, WU Q F, ZHANG Z Q.Research on storage stability and improvement measures of rubber modified asphalt [J]. Highway,2012(03):203⁃207. | |
5 | 郑凯军. 热解高掺量废胶粉改性沥青存储稳定性研究[D].重庆大学,2017. |
6 | Wang S, Yuan C, Jiaxi D. Crumb tire rubber and polyethylene mutually stabilized in asphalt by screw extrusion[J]. Appl Polym Sci,2014,131 (23). |
7 | Wang S, Wang Q, WuX, et al. Asphalt modified by thermoplastic elastomer based on recycled rubber[J].Constr Build Mater, 2015,93:678⁃684. |
8 | Shojaei A M, Sun C, Yao Z, et al. Utilization of wax residue as compatibilizer for asphalt with ground tire rubber/recycled polyethylene blends[J].Constr Build Mater, 2020, (230). |
9 | El⁃NemrK F, KhalilA M. Gamma irradiation of treated waste rubber powder and its composites with waste polyethylene[J]. Vinyl Add Tech, 2011,17(1): 58⁃63. |
10 | Ming Liang,SunChangjun,YaoZhanyong,et al. Utilization of wax residue as compatibilizer for asphalt with ground tire rubber/recycled polyethylene blends[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2020,230. |
11 | 任瑞波,耿立涛,徐强,等.废旧橡塑合金改性剂制备及其改性基质沥青的机理[J].建筑材料学报,2016,19(03):528⁃533. |
REN R B, GENG L T, XU Q, et al.Preparation of reclaimed rubber⁃ plastic alloying agent and its modification mechanism on matrix asphalt [J].Journal of Building Materials, 2016,19(03):528⁃533. | |
12 | 谭坦.废旧橡塑合金改性沥青混合料路用性能及应用研究[D].山东建筑大学,2014. |
13 | 刘占斌.稳定型废旧橡塑高分子合金改性沥青性能预估模型研究[D].山东建筑大学,2017. |
14 | 张春茹.稳定型橡塑高分子合金改性沥青的研究[D].山东建筑大学,2015. |
15 | 颜宇.橡塑合金(TPE)沥青改性剂路用性能研究[D].重庆交通大学,2012. |
16 | 陈智蓉.新型橡塑合金改性沥青性能研究[D].重庆交通大学,2013. |
17 | 李晶,张春华,侯典浩,等.一种新型橡塑合金沥青改性剂的研制及其改性效果的研究[J].功能材料,2016,47 (S1):228-233. |
LI J, ZHANG C H, HOU D H, et al. Research on the road performance of asphalt modified by a new preparation type of polymer alloy made of waste rubber powder and plastic [J]. Journal of Functional Materials, 2016,47 (S1):228-233. | |
18 | 杨正军.橡塑合金改性沥青的路用性能研究[J].交通世界(建养.机械),2015(11):126⁃128. |
YANG Z J. Study on road performance of rubber⁃plastic alloy modified asphalt [J]. Transpoworld, 2015(11):126⁃128. | |
19 | 张琳慧.橡塑合金(TPE)改性沥青路面施工技术[J].交通科技与经济,2014,16(04):91⁃94. |
ZHANG L H. Rubber and plastic alloy (TPE) modified asphalt pavement construction technology[J]. Technology &. Economy in Areas of Communications. 2014,16(04):91⁃94. | |
20 | 柳和生,吕柏源.双螺杆挤出机的结构及工作性能评述[J].橡胶技术与装备,1996(01):1⁃7+35. |
LIU H S, LYU B Y. Review on structure and performance of twin screw extruders[J]. China Rubber Technology And Equipment, 1996(01):1⁃7+35. | |
21 | 黄刚,李妍,汪涛.一种橡塑高黏沥青的研发[J].中外公路,2018,38(01):234⁃239. |
HUANG G, LI Y, WANG T.Research on the development of a kind of rubber plastic modified asphalt of high viscosity[J].Journal of China & Foreign Highway,2018,38(01):234⁃239. | |
22 | 刘磊,伍任雄,史灵玉.废橡塑高黏改性沥青性能影响因素及制备研究[J].重庆建筑,2020,19(04):35⁃37. |
LIU L, WU R X, SHI L Y.Study on influencing factors and preparation of waste rubber⁃plastic high⁃viscosity modified asphalt[J]. Chongqing Architecture,2020,19(04):35⁃37. | |
23 | 天津市市政工程设计研究院. 天津市硫化橡胶粉改性沥青路面技术规程 [S].2018. |
24 | 李宁利,武旭,赵新坡,等.废轮胎胶粉⁃废塑料复合改性沥青制备工艺[J].塑料,2019,48(03):19⁃22+35. |
LI N L, WU X, ZHAO X P, et al. | |
Preparation technology of waste tire rubber powder and waste plastic compound modified a sphalt[J].Plastic, 2019,48(03):19⁃22+35. | |
25 | DENG Ju⁃long. Introduction to grey system theory[J].Journal of Grey System, 1989, 1(1):1⁃24. |
[1] | 刘延宽, 顾子琛, 王志平. 连续纤维增强热塑性预浸料制备工艺与发展趋势[J]. 中国塑料, 2022, 36(2): 172-181. |
[2] | 魏诗艺, 唐韵韬, 柴晨泽, 张玉霞, 周洪福. 聚乳酸开孔材料研究进展[J]. 中国塑料, 2020, 34(10): 100-109. |
[3] | 万彬, 范希营, 郭永环, 单以波. 注塑保压曲线的优化设计与分析[J]. 中国塑料, 2017, 31(05): 71-77 . |
[4] | 冯国威, 张玲. 马来酸酐含量及制备工艺对PA6/POE-g-MAH/Nano-CaCO3复合材料形态及力学性能的影响[J]. 中国塑料, 2016, 30(06): 13-17 . |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||